Toward more optimistic futures

Toward more optimistic futures

Dystopian futures tend to dominate media and our psyche these days. Some say that this is because were are not imaginative enough. Others suggest that the problem is we are being too imaginative, indulging in wishful thinking poorly connected to reality that weakens more positive futures. Both views are often right. Futures methods provide the means to be more creative and realistic, but lack the power of dystopia. The problem may lie more with how we frame and undertake futures activities. Here’s how we can help change that.

Illustrating complexity in environmental scans

Illustrating complexity in environmental scans

Environmental scanning is an essential futures practice. The purpose of scanning is to systematically identify trends, developments, and points of inertia that may influence an organisation’s (or society’s) future operating environment. Such scans are usually long, and good visual summaries are hard to find. In this post I look at one way that can help illustrate some key insights from the environmental scan I recently did for NZ Search & Rescue.

Goldilocks and the three futures

Goldilocks and the three futures

Thinking about the future often adopts a relatively short-term timeframe. We should be more courageous and explore longer timeframes, especially the next 100 years. This helps us break from our assumptions, consider what systemic changes may be desirable, and how they may play out beyond the short-term. Goldilocks and the three bears provides a useful metaphorical prompt for exploring different timeframes.

Learning from the techno-hype

We can too quickly accept or dismiss reports of technological “breakthroughs” or developments. It is important to consider if they are just hype as well as what else needs to happen before they can become everyday realities. Future thinkers also need to contemplate what the particular developments indicate about broader trends or mindsets that are driving, or inhibiting, change.